🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives laid to rest in graves vulnerable to coastal erosion argue that indecision over how to tackle the problem is creating avoidable anguish about the eternal homes of their loved ones.

An Impending Threat to Ancient Graveyards

Local authorities have identified three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being engulfed by the sea in the coming decades.

A newly published study on the situation sets out a range of options, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and reburying them in more secure sites. Authorities maintain it is for the community to decide how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. They wanted this to serve as their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections indicate at least part of one graveyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner recalled a school trip to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the water, along with its church and graveyard.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that the deceased will just get washed out to sea. That is not the case. Individuals will take bones as souvenirs and go plundering graves in search of valuables. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the shore. I would feel appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Further up the coast lies the grave of a former paratrooper who died while serving overseas. His mother expressed she lost sleep after discovering her child's grave might one day be relocated.

“It does trouble me to consider this may not remain his permanent home,” she said. “To our family it’s an important site to visit.”

In her view, new burials should stop but says it is premature to exhume current plots. “My preference for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an timely resolution must be made when a tipping point has been reached.”

Seeking Answers and Clarity

An absence of agreement over when and how to tackle the problem has resulted in grieving relatives feeling frustrated and anxious.

Some are calling for more coastal protections to delay the inevitable erosion and to allow funerals to proceed for now. Others contend the time for moving graves is approaching.

“It is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And everybody is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager confirmed the graveyards were owned and managed of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is down to them to choose the path to take. We are here to help support them through that journey with communities.”

It was also stated there was time to consider all the choices. “We are talking decades before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should happen yet. We need productive community discussions to find the appropriate solutions for each village.”

The possibility of losing the historic sites was described as one of “profound sadness for the local community,” but church representatives also spoke of a doctrine in life after death, providing a spiritual viewpoint on the physical loss of sacred ground.